|
Hypnosis:
Chronic trauma and dissociation
There is a wide
range of literature concerning
the use of hypnosis and the
treatment of chronic trauma and
Dissociative Identity Disorder.
Hypnosis is a facilitator of
treatment, not a treatment in
and of itself. Clinicians should
always be adequately trained in
any adjunctive modalities –
especially hypnosis – that they
are using in the treatment of a
particular patient.
If one is
interested In this area I would
encourage individuals to look at
my links page at appropriate
professional societies e.g.
ISSD, ESTD.
One just needs to
look even at the early the
pioneering work of Pierre Janet
in the area of dissociation
(1859-1947). His thesis
L'automatisme psychologique
brought
together
a wealth of related clinical
information on a variety of
abnormal mental states related
to hysteria and psychosis.
Dividing such
states into total (involving the
whole personality) and partial
(part of the personality split
from awareness and following its
own psychological existence)
automatisms, Janet employed
automatic writing and hypnosis
to identify the traumatic
origins and explore the nature
of automatism.
Multiple
personalities, which Janet
called "successive existences,"
and the experience of possession
were treated as partial
automatisms.
Although careful
to avoid direct discussion of
the therapeutic implications of
his work in a non- medical
dissertation, Janet laid the
foundations for his own and
Freud's later therapeutic
approaches through his
demonstration of the origins of
splitting in psychic traumas in
the patient's past history.
Accordingly, many
hypnotic techniques have been
developed to assist with DID
treatment. DID experts generally
agree that hypnotic techniques
can be useful both in session
and between sessions if patients
are taught autohypnosis. 
Since, as a
group, DID patients are highly
hypnotizable, many techniques
developed for use with hypnosis
can be used without the formal
induction of trance utilizing
patients' auto hypnotic
abilities.
Hypnotic
techniques can be used for
ego-strengthening, symptom
exploration and relief, anxiety
relief, accessing alternate
identities and
restoring
adult identities when immature
or dysfunctional identities are
in control at a session's end,
containment of flashbacks,
containment and control of both
spontaneous and facilitated
expressions of strong feelings
and abreactions, stabilizing the
patient or particular identities
between sessions, exploration
and relief of painful somatic
expressions of traumatic
materials, restabilising and
restoring mastery, cognitive
rehearsal and skill building,
facilitating communication
within the alternate identity
system, and in fusion rituals.
There is little
controversy about the use of
hypnosis for supportive and ego
strengthening interventions,
resolving crisis, stabilization,
and promoting integration.
Hypnosis may also be used to
provide a relaxed state and to
better facilitate modulation and
titration of affect while
working on already recalled
traumatic memories in Phase 2
therapy (e.g., placing traumatic
images on a mental “screen” to
see them at more of a distance,
etc.). The impact of using these
techniques on memory material
itself has not been studied and
it is unclear to what extent, if
any, these hypnotic techniques
influence the patient's recall
(Brown, Scheflin, & Hammond,
1998).
As with any other
specialized technique, the
therapeutic use of hypnosis
should be conducted with
appropriate informed consent
provided to the patient
concerning its possible
benefits, risks, limitations,
and current controversies
concerning hypnosis and delayed
recall of trauma as well as for
the use of hypnosis for the
diagnosis and treatment of DID
and other trauma disorders.
Informed consent should include
possible limitations on the
permissibility of testimony in
legal settings concerning
recollections obtained under
hypnosis based on the statutes
and judicial rulings of the
jurisdiction in which the
therapist practices (American
Society of Clinical Hypnosis,
1994)'. |